02-02-2015, 09:02 AM #1
smart USA president Dave Schembri on clunkers, upcoming electric smarts
In the first year that smart fortwo's were available in the U.S., the company sold about 30,000 units. After that first heady period, though, sales dropped off dramatically. In June 2009, the company sold just 1,116 fortwos and in May the number was 1,169, for an annual rate of just over 13,000. This is below the company's earlier predictions of 25,000 sales in 2009. smart USA president Dave Schembri told AutoblogGreen that his company's new $99/month financing deal might be just the thing to turn the numbers around. smart USA is offering the deal as part of the new Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS, aka "cash for clunkers"), which officially started today. Read on after the jump to see what Shembri thinks about why fortwos are the right car right now, when the first all-electric smarts will come to the U.S. and why you should be able to trade in your dad's clunker.
Schembri believes that the fortwo has, well, two big things going for it that make it a good choice for someone looking to get rid of their clunker. First, every fortwo qualifies for the maximum $4,500 CARS voucher, because all of them have a high enough mpg rating (he called them the most fuel efficient non-hybrid vehicles available in the U.S. today). These fuel efficiency numbers lead to his second point, which is that the intent of CARS was to get cleaner air, and so the cars should appeal to people who are buying a new vehicle with the environment in mind. Thus far, he said, "We've had an extremely positive reaction."
Negative reactions, though, could result from people discovering that the $99 a month loan plan has a bit of a shocker at the end of the three years: a balloon payment of $6,667. Schembri said this isn't a "gigantic" payment and that customer would have a positive equity at the end of the three years because of the relatively conservative residual value of the fortwo. In terms of conventional financing, he said, customers can get a more standard 72-month loan at roughly $150 a month with no balloon payment at the end. He's confident that the deal is a good one, and that sales could grow as a result. In fact, Daimler ramped up production in anticipation of more sales. "Right now, in the environment that we're in, it's very difficult to compare yourself to any particular point in time," he said, adding that he would like to at least see a sales increase compared to last month. Given the success of similar clunkers legislation in Germany, this isn't an unreasonable hope.
Of course, CARS isn't a perfect system. Schembri said that he favors expanding the program.
Quote:We think this is a great program. It will be an indication that when you put money into the hands of the consumer, you stimulate the economy. Any time that something works, you want to keep it in the system. There are a lot of eyes on the start of the program.
Schembri is also called the 18 mpg limit "a little bit restrictive" and said he favors making the important factor the change in mpg instead of from one set point to another. "If you're improving by 10 mpg, that's a big improvement and certainly going to help us out form the environmental perspective," he said.
Lastly, we asked what the status is with Daimler's all-electric smart eds that are being tested in Europe. Schembri explained:
Quote:We're right there with it. We're going to have 300 full electric vehicles available in the latter half of 2010 and will go into full series production in 2011. Haven't figure out exactly how to do the distribution, but they will be for general consumer use.
Source: smart USA president Dave Schembri on clunkers, upcoming electric smarts
02-03-2015, 09:05 AM #2
Hi SATO, (you knew I'd rise to this fly)
OK... when an article reads "Smart" I turn on the warning system. It's "smart" is it not?
The transmission is the easiest thing to criticize, especially by drivers of big, soft, standard automatics. The decision to fit all US models with the Auto OPTION and not provide the Turbo OPTION was a mistake, in my opinion. They should have imported the Pulse instead of the Passion. Pulse has the performance options that the Passion lacks. On the Pulse, Auto is an extra cost option... which reinforces the European design ideas where manual shifts historically are preferred to auto.
Another thing that does concern me is that some (if not all) smarts require a bit of bedding in of the clutch plates. With use, the transmission (on my pulse, at least) does smoothen out. It was herky jerky when new and auto was a rocking chair. Now it is much smoother and after learning it's idiosyncrasies, I'm much happier using auto, but still prefer manual shifts with the paddles. Paddle shift is as fast and smooth as anything I have ever achieved with a pedal clutch.
smart cars need to be run in... unlike most Asian cars. Journos should be given cars with 5,000 miles on the clock to test drive. Clutch, tires, brakes, engine; all need to be run in on the smart before they perform smoothly.
02-04-2015, 09:05 AM #3
another half baked retard, maybe i should make instructional videos on driving a smart... blanco must be his IQ
my driving videos show smooth performance at the recent midwest smart rally, and smooth, even at speeds up to 81mph. (i had no choice in the speed, i was tailing the others, only the lead guy knew where we were all going and he set the pace)
02-05-2015, 09:06 AM #4
The only real negative thing about the smart is our strict diesel laws here in the USA. I'd love to have my smart with a diesel engine and get 60mpg. In the early 80's I had a VW diesel Rabbit that got 50 mpg. It was not all that fast but I did get better mileage than most. There were a few people not bashing the smart in that article but the majority were trashing it. I'd be willing to bet most of them have never driven a Smart for any length of time. With the paddles I can shift as smooth as silk (took me a month to get it down). And I have found that if you just accelerate normally the auto is a lot smoother. It seems more jerky when you're dogging on it. I don't understand why everyone has such a negative predisposed opinion of the smart. It is what it is, and will get better with time and development.
Tags for this Thread
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|